G&P vs VFC vs G&G

[iBakez]

Re: G&P vs VFC vs G&G

ive seen both sides of the VFC - one is rock solid and works perfectly, one was a bag of bolts brand new out of the box and never worked properly and had to be replaced

Id go TM over anything else now

[perry.L]

Re: G&P vs VFC vs G&G

im afraid that TM wasnt an option if you cant pick out of one of the 4 then why comment at all ... *facepalm* .

[TOBI]

Re: G&P vs VFC vs G&G

G&P are the best all rounder IMO,

G&G internally are on par but the externals are slightly below G&P standards.

I cant comment specifically on VFC M4's however on the Scar H i had the externals were disappointing and the internals were poor for the price, especially the wiring

Lol are you sure you got a VFC? I've heard of poor internals by some but never poor internals.

[steve grey]

Re: G&P vs VFC vs G&G

im afraid that TM wasnt an option if you cant pick out of one of the 4 then why comment at all ... *facepalm* .

VFC, out of those for me, also, I think Bakez, was trying to be helpful Perry, we're like that on here !

[psirus101]

Re: G&P vs VFC vs G&G

also, I think Bakez, was trying to be helpful Perry

Yay! TM am bestest, TM am bestest! *puts 'TM am bestest' flag back in box for next thread not asking about any TM guns what so ever.

Again, I'd go VFC, if only because I think my PDW might actually be bulletproof.

[steve grey]

Re: G&P vs VFC vs G&G

I still think he was just being nice, and offering his best advice.

[caffin999]

Re: G&P vs VFC vs G&G

Yay! TM am bestest, TM am bestest! *puts 'TM am bestest' flag back in box for next thread not asking about any TM guns what so ever.

Again, I'd go VFC, if only because I think my PDW might actually be bulletproof.

my mates pdw is the same! Just keeps on running!

[perry.L]

Re: G&P vs VFC vs G&G

the reason i didnt put TM as an option is because theyre alot more expensive than the majority of brands and also you dont get much bang for your buck. if you want a good gun for a reasonable price then i would get a VFC because they are easily uprgadeable where is if you get a TM you wont have to replace internals that much but getting the external quality up to the standard of most other brands out there then you will be alot more where as if you bought a VFC you wouldnt have to upgrade externals barely at all but maybe a little bit of internals which IMO will be cheaper and the same quality if not better.

[sparrowhawk]

Re: G&P vs VFC vs G&G

sorry i have to disagree, my vfc cost pretty much the same as my tm.......

[Cojack]

Re: G&P vs VFC vs G&G

Inclined to agree with the above - I had a VFC M4ES dagger and they're around a few hundred quid.

Fantastic CQB gun, snub nose and pretty noisy - unfortunately gearbox died after the third skirmish, had to be replaced. In terms of build quality and looks the VFC is second to none in the options you've listed, although G&P are rated with some of the best M4 variants and looks, I'd still go with VFC. I think G&P tend to be a bit more expensive for the equivalent VFC...

Jack

[heroshark]

Re: G&P vs VFC vs G&G

vfc has the best exturnals/build ,inturnaly not bad either .If you have the money go for vfc

[middo85]

Re: G&P vs VFC vs G&G

Lol are you sure you got a VFC? I've heard of poor internals by some but never poor internals.

Definately a VFC, it was the deluxe version with the silencer and hardcase. I didnt say the externals were poor, just disappointing for a £400+ gun. The version i had came without trades, the plastics didnt feel great quality and the stock design is terrible.

The internals on the other hand were poor compared to G&P and G&G's ive had in the past.

VFC quality seems to vary gun to gun, ive handled a deluxe model PDW and it was lovely, on a par with or maybe better than my G&P externally.