Login or Sign Up
Logging in...
Remember me
Login
Forgot password or user name?
or
Sign Up
Log in with
Forums
Classifieds
Groups
Zero One Airsoft
Ground Zero Airsoft
Airsoft Festival
Today's Posts
|
Member List
|
Calendar
|
Forum Rules
|
Forum
Airsoft Related
Advice & New Players
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Zero One Ads
Collapse
which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
Collapse
X
Collapse
Posts
Latest Activity
Photos
Search
Page
of
1
Filter
Time
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
Show
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Filtered by:
Clear All
new posts
Previous
template
Next
strettman
Colonel
Join Date:
Sep 2008
Posts:
1611
Share
Tweet
#1
which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
7 January, 2010, 17:33
Hi guys,
I am looking to find out what would be the better manufacturer for the m16/m4 mags out there. I am wanting to know specifically which is best, Classic armys 130 round mid-caps or G&Ps version of the magazine? Do any of them have the tendency to mis-feed? Have any of you guys had any problems with either of them?
thanks guys
jagillham
General
Join Date:
Oct 2008
Posts:
8373
Share
Tweet
#2
7 January, 2010, 17:40
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
Neither :D
S. Arms 160 round metal midcaps for the win. About £14 - £15 each if you know where to shop!
Comment
Post
Cancel
cooldragon224
Corporal
Join Date:
Oct 2009
Posts:
101
Share
Tweet
#3
7 January, 2010, 17:41
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
I have 3 g&p mid cap and 2 ares mid cap. All of them always have problem,bb often jammed and I dnt even knwn wat to do..........wasted money,I think high cap work great but it just u hav to wind it and it make noise...thats all
Comment
Post
Cancel
strettman
Colonel
Join Date:
Sep 2008
Posts:
1611
Share
Tweet
#4
7 January, 2010, 17:46
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
jagillham you just want me to buy some off of you don't you :D
so G&P's mags started off with a bad on this thread, anyone on here using the CA ones?
Comment
Post
Cancel
THE-ROGER
Captain
Join Date:
Sep 2009
Posts:
519
Share
Tweet
#5
7 January, 2010, 17:52
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
magpull are brilliant but you need 2 to go round the mag 2 times with tape to make it a tight fit in a g&p
Comment
Post
Cancel
THE-ROGER
Captain
Join Date:
Sep 2009
Posts:
519
Share
Tweet
#6
7 January, 2010, 17:53
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
oh yeah and i use cA mids and there long lasting but scratch easily and feel like baked bean tins
Comment
Post
Cancel
strettman
Colonel
Join Date:
Sep 2008
Posts:
1611
Share
Tweet
#7
7 January, 2010, 17:57
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
k, thanks for the replies guys.
@ cool dragon, did you get the mags second hand? did you ever lube them?
thanks
Comment
Post
Cancel
crotmate
Colonel
Join Date:
Jan 2009
Posts:
1588
Share
Tweet
#8
7 January, 2010, 18:13
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
Ive got 8 Mag midcaps and 3 G&P midcaps, the G&P ones are fine in my opinion, they feed properly right to the last BB, i havent had the need to lube any of my mags in 4 months
Originally posted by
fijitstiks
they are a waste of time dont know why the british army still has them
Originally posted by
N3ADS
Is this you talking from experience ?..
Originally posted by
fijitstiks
i was at cadets for 3 years
Comment
Post
Cancel
danhc
Major
Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
974
Share
Tweet
#9
7 January, 2010, 18:15
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
ive got 3 g and p tracer mags and they have fed flawlessly, you just have to maintain them and not over load them
PM me if you're looking for S-ARMS M4 mags
Comment
Post
Cancel
Panoptes
General
Join Date:
Dec 2008
Posts:
7752
Share
Tweet
#10
7 January, 2010, 18:20
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
Originally posted by
jagillham
View Post
Neither :D
S. Arms 160 round metal midcaps for the win. About £14 - £15 each if you know where to shop!
Quoted for truth. No mags come close.
Comment
Post
Cancel
jagillham
General
Join Date:
Oct 2008
Posts:
8373
Share
Tweet
#11
7 January, 2010, 18:26
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
Originally posted by
strettman
View Post
jagillham you just want me to buy some off of you don't you :D
Not got any for sale myself, but I can put you in contact with a USA supplier
Comment
Post
Cancel
strettman
Colonel
Join Date:
Sep 2008
Posts:
1611
Share
Tweet
#12
7 January, 2010, 18:31
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
i'll get in touch later with you mate if i am interested :D
Comment
Post
Cancel
cyberi4n
Captain
Join Date:
Jan 2008
Posts:
688
Share
Tweet
#13
7 January, 2010, 19:45
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
I have G&P mids and they're brilliant - no probs with them at all. £5 each from a certain hobby shop - well they were a year ago...
WE G39C GBB | ARES G36K EBB
Comment
Post
Cancel
Gaffa
General
Join Date:
Jan 2009
Posts:
5252
Share
Tweet
#14
7 January, 2010, 20:19
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
I've noticed that MAG have recently released box sets of Metal, 190 round magazines. Panoptes had a few for sale, possibly check them out on EHA?
Please get in touch if you want general help. Please report problematic posts.
Take responsibility for your choices. If you break any rule in life, you should be held accountable.
Comment
Post
Cancel
strettman
Colonel
Join Date:
Sep 2008
Posts:
1611
Share
Tweet
#15
7 January, 2010, 20:23
Re: which is better CA m16 130rnd mids, or G&P's version
cheers gaffa will check 'em out
Comment
Post
Cancel
Previous
template
Next
About the Author
Collapse
i have no soul...... according to south park Find out more about
strettman
Working...
Yes
No
OK
OK
Cancel
X