Login or Sign Up
Logging in...
Remember me
Login
Forgot password or user name?
or
Sign Up
Log in with
Forums
Classifieds
Groups
Zero One Airsoft
Ground Zero Airsoft
Airsoft Festival
Today's Posts
|
Member List
|
Calendar
|
Forum Rules
|
Forum
Airsoft Related
General Airsoft Discussion
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Zero One Ads
Collapse
Airsoft RPG and the law
Collapse
X
Collapse
Posts
Latest Activity
Photos
Search
Page
of
1
Filter
Time
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
Show
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Filtered by:
Clear All
new posts
Previous
template
Next
Tiercel
Brigadier
Join Date:
Dec 2009
Posts:
2918
Share
Tweet
#1
Airsoft RPG and the law
9 January, 2011, 23:43
Ive got a rather ambitious plan, of perhaps making my own RPG-7, because Im not willing to pay silly amounts of money to buy one.
Having seen how quickly the M1A1 Bazooka thread went downhill in the tech section, I wanted to get some answers before I even start.
Firstly, is it legal? From what I can see, theres no reason why it should be illegal.
I have no intention of making it launch a projectile other than bb's, it will use a 40mm 'nade shell and essentially be a giant M203. It will not launch nerf rockets, balls, thermobarics or anything like that
Now seeing as we're allowed to have M203's, and theres already a comercially available RPG, I cant see why this would be a problem from a legal standpoint, unless its something silly along the lines of manufacturers are allowed to make them, but youre not allowed to make one yourself. (In which case surely everyone who's ever replaced a 2tone body with a non 2tone after getting UKARA has broken the law, or covered up 2tone with sniper tape etc. so has anyone who's ever put real steel parts on thier gun or taken the body kit off a thundermaul etc.)
From my understanding, the problem arises from using it to launch explosive projectiles, such as flashbangs or thermobarics, hence the shitstorm surrounding other threads regarding people using M203's to launch flashbangs etc. however I could be wrong.
Panoptes
General
Join Date:
Dec 2008
Posts:
7752
Share
Tweet
#2
9 January, 2011, 23:44
Re: Airsoft RPG and the law
Have you seen the dramas the Deepfire launcher's causing someone over at Arnie's?
Comment
Post
Cancel
Tiercel
Brigadier
Join Date:
Dec 2009
Posts:
2918
Share
Tweet
#3
9 January, 2011, 23:47
Re: Airsoft RPG and the law
Nope, I dont use Arnies. Though I did consider making myself a deepfire/LAW first becuase it would probably be a lot easier, but then I thought why settle for that? I want an RPG!
Last edited by
Sci Fi Steve
;
10 January, 2011, 07:25
.
Reason:
language
Comment
Post
Cancel
Froggy
Lieutenant
Join Date:
Apr 2010
Posts:
275
Share
Tweet
#4
9 January, 2011, 23:51
Re: Airsoft RPG and the law
If you're using a 40mm nade, you're at most only making a differently-shelled M203 in effect.
If I understand correctly, you're basically making a prop RPG, with the firing mechanism for 40mm nades in it. Can't see much wrong with that.
Altus Volo Mugio Extraho
Comment
Post
Cancel
Jon Bon
Lieutenant
Join Date:
Aug 2010
Posts:
302
Share
Tweet
#5
9 January, 2011, 23:53
Re: Airsoft RPG and the law
Originally posted by
Panoptes
View Post
Have you seen the dramas the Deepfire launcher's causing someone over at Arnie's?
O.o Please tell?
Originally posted by
Boo-Sabum Ben
Thats why i lopped mine off! :D
Comment
Post
Cancel
Panoptes
General
Join Date:
Dec 2008
Posts:
7752
Share
Tweet
#6
10 January, 2011, 00:26
Re: Airsoft RPG and the law
It's a long thread.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Ian IWG
Major
Join Date:
Aug 2009
Posts:
906
Share
Tweet
#7
10 January, 2011, 01:57
Re: Airsoft RPG and the law
They are legal as long as it does not fire a finned projectile, not even a foam one as I recall. Firing nads is fine.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Previous
template
Next
About the Author
Collapse
Find out more about
Tiercel
Working...
Yes
No
OK
OK
Cancel
X