Login or Sign Up
Logging in...
Remember me
Login
Forgot password or user name?
or
Sign Up
Log in with
Forums
Classifieds
Groups
Zero One Airsoft
Ground Zero Airsoft
Airsoft Festival
Today's Posts
|
Member List
|
Calendar
|
Forum Rules
|
Forum
Airsoft Related
Pictures Of Your Guns
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Zero One Ads
Collapse
Real Sword Type 56 vs Type 56 Deact
Collapse
X
Collapse
Posts
Latest Activity
Photos
Search
Page
of
1
Filter
Time
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
Show
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Filtered by:
Clear All
new posts
Previous
template
Next
blobface
Captain
Join Date:
Feb 2011
Posts:
545
Share
Tweet
#1
Real Sword Type 56 vs Type 56 Deact
1 March, 2012, 18:32
Will do a proper comparison with a good camera after, but can you easily tell which one's which?
Coski
Account Not Validated
Join Date:
Oct 2011
Posts:
2754
Share
Tweet
#2
1 March, 2012, 18:36
Re: Real Sword Type 56 vs Type 56 Deact
Id say the right one is the deact? Just because I cant see any spring under in the gap beneath the top cover :P.
If it wasnt for that I wouldnt know! In fact Im probably wrong!
Comment
Post
Cancel
Turkey
Captain
Join Date:
Mar 2011
Posts:
741
Share
Tweet
#3
1 March, 2012, 18:38
Re: Real Sword Type 56 vs Type 56 Deact
i would say the right one is the deact aswell
Comment
Post
Cancel
Apurturesci
General
Join Date:
Jan 2010
Posts:
5514
Share
Tweet
#4
1 March, 2012, 18:40
Re: Real Sword Type 56 vs Type 56 Deact
I can't tell if the front sight is hooded or not :3 That would be the differing factor.
The one on the right looks more like an AKM sight though, so I'll assume that's the deac.
Last edited by
Apurturesci
;
1 March, 2012, 18:49
.
Comment
Post
Cancel
blobface
Captain
Join Date:
Feb 2011
Posts:
545
Share
Tweet
#5
1 March, 2012, 19:04
Re: Real Sword Type 56 vs Type 56 Deact
Originally posted by
Apurturesci
View Post
I can't tell if the front sight is hooded or not :3 That would be the differing factor.
The one on the right looks more like an AKM sight though, so I'll assume that's the deac.
They are both type 56... front sights look identical to each other.
Comment
Post
Cancel
sparrowhawk
General
Join Date:
May 2008
Posts:
6191
Share
Tweet
#6
1 March, 2012, 19:12
Re: Real Sword Type 56 vs Type 56 Deact
id say the right one is the deact, because the left one looks newer
VICTORIA CONCORDIA CRESCIT
LOOKING FOR: S&W N-frame holster
trader feedback
http://forums.zeroin.co.uk/itrader.php?u=5191
Comment
Post
Cancel
cool-breeze87
Lieutenant Colonel
Join Date:
Feb 2010
Posts:
1257
Share
Tweet
#7
1 March, 2012, 19:22
Re: Real Sword Type 56 vs Type 56 Deact
The one on the right is the deac, you can tell by the wood furniture and lack of spring under the top cover.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Apurturesci
General
Join Date:
Jan 2010
Posts:
5514
Share
Tweet
#8
1 March, 2012, 19:35
Re: Real Sword Type 56 vs Type 56 Deact
Originally posted by
blobface
View Post
They are both type 56... front sights look identical to each other.
Oh yeah, silly me :3 For some reason I read it as Ak47 Deac :p
Comment
Post
Cancel
PureSilver
Colonel
Join Date:
Jun 2011
Posts:
1693
Share
Tweet
#9
1 March, 2012, 21:14
Re: Real Sword Type 56 vs Type 56 Deact
I'd say the one on the right's the deactivated one; the finish is less consistent.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Previous
template
Next
About the Author
Collapse
Find out more about
blobface
Working...
Yes
No
OK
OK
Cancel
X