Login or Sign Up
Logging in...
Remember me
Login
Forgot password or user name?
or
Sign Up
Log in with
Forums
Classifieds
Groups
Zero One Airsoft
Ground Zero Airsoft
Airsoft Festival
Today's Posts
|
Member List
|
Calendar
|
Forum Rules
|
Forum
Airsoft Related
General Airsoft Discussion
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Zero One Ads
Collapse
Swiss Cheese & General Piston Weight Reduction
Collapse
X
Collapse
Posts
Latest Activity
Photos
Search
Page
of
3
Filter
Time
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
Show
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Filtered by:
Clear All
new posts
Previous
1
2
3
template
Next
jagillham
General
Join Date:
Oct 2008
Posts:
8373
Share
Tweet
#31
7 September, 2011, 18:52
Re: Swiss Cheese & General Piston Weight Reduction
What's the right answer then
I know Db is "logarithmic" - so isn't as simple as 1 is half the noise of 2.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Spooros
Lieutenant
Join Date:
Dec 2008
Posts:
255
Share
Tweet
#32
7 September, 2011, 19:36
Re: Swiss Cheese & General Piston Weight Reduction
I may have to hang my head in shame
1*10-12 W/m2
Comment
Post
Cancel
jagillham
General
Join Date:
Oct 2008
Posts:
8373
Share
Tweet
#33
7 September, 2011, 19:45
Re: Swiss Cheese & General Piston Weight Reduction
That's all well and good... but what is the answer to:
How much quieter is 94Db against 98Db. In terms of say percentage?
Comment
Post
Cancel
SAS Scott
Banned
Join Date:
Oct 2009
Posts:
2974
Share
Tweet
#34
7 September, 2011, 19:49
Re: Swiss Cheese & General Piston Weight Reduction
98 db thats very loud 0.0
Comment
Post
Cancel
Spooros
Lieutenant
Join Date:
Dec 2008
Posts:
255
Share
Tweet
#35
7 September, 2011, 19:51
Re: Swiss Cheese & General Piston Weight Reduction
In comparison terms it goes from a train to a lawnmower
Comment
Post
Cancel
ElCarl
Colonel
Join Date:
Feb 2010
Posts:
1612
Share
Tweet
#36
7 September, 2011, 19:56
Re: Swiss Cheese & General Piston Weight Reduction
Originally posted by
jagillham
View Post
That's all well and good... but what is the answer to:
How much quieter is 94Db against 98Db. In terms of say percentage?
I think 1 Bel is 10x volume. So 10Db is 10x, not 1Db.
Others till I die
Comment
Post
Cancel
jagillham
General
Join Date:
Oct 2008
Posts:
8373
Share
Tweet
#37
7 September, 2011, 19:59
Re: Swiss Cheese & General Piston Weight Reduction
So what we saying here..... 98Db is
roughly
3x louder than 94Db??
Comment
Post
Cancel
North West Outpost
Major General
Join Date:
Aug 2009
Posts:
4240
Share
Tweet
#38
7 September, 2011, 21:21
Re: Swiss Cheese & General Piston Weight Reduction
Isn't it -3db half as loud?
At 98db that is above the first stage action, so you should think about ear protection. The meter should be 1m away from the source for the readings.
Gun tech.
AIRSOFTERS.........Load of Balls.!
http://forums.zeroin.co.uk/showthrea...r-Offizier-M41
Comment
Post
Cancel
jagillham
General
Join Date:
Oct 2008
Posts:
8373
Share
Tweet
#39
7 September, 2011, 21:37
Re: Swiss Cheese & General Piston Weight Reduction
For those who seem to be saying the reading is not right....
Environmental Noise
Weakest sound heard 0dB
Whisper Quiet Library 30dB
Normal conversation (3-5') 60-70dB
Telephone dial tone 80dB
City Traffic (inside car) 85dB
Train whistle at 500', Truck Traffic 90dB
Subway train at 200' 95dB
Power mower at 3' 107dB
Snowmobile, Motorcycle 100dB
Power saw at 3' 110dB
Sandblasting, Loud Rock Concert 115dB
Seems about right to me!
Full article here anyway....
I read a lot of this lately, some call it a myth.
So i just test some things:
a) Alupiston & head: 38g
b) JG stockpiston & head: 21g (-17g)
c) JG stockpiston swiss cheesed (SC) & head: 17g (-21g)
d) JG stockpiston swiss cheesed (SC) & head without bearing: 12g (-26g)
Testsystem:
- JG GB from AUG A3
- CA motor
- 400 fps
- white stock JG piston, think its made of PC or nylonfibre or something else...
- JG pistonhead with bearing
- JG MOSFET (1404) with DEANS and awg 14 cables
- 9,6V 1500 mAh NiMh battery, 2/3A cells
ROF:
Measured with audacity
a) 17 RPS
b) 19 RPS
c) 19 RPS (! see fps! )
d) 20 RPS (! see fps! )
Here a pic of this test: 1x track b) and 2x from a), 1 second is marked:
FPS:
Chrony Xcortech X3200
a) 2nd ROF-test, forgot fps
b) 1st ROF-test, 400 fps
c) 4th ROF-test, 380 fps (i dont know where the missing 20 fps are)
d) 3rd ROF-test, 360 fps (bearing has 5.7mm, so less compression of the spring)
Loudness:
measured with a decible meter, 50cm from the front of the GB, 20cm to the side (but doesn't matter much):
a) 98 dB
b) 95 dB
c) sry, forgot
d) 94 dB
dont forget that decibel is a logarithmic unit. 10 dB would be twice as loud for your subjective feeling.
My conclusion so far:
Less piston & pistonhead weight will give you more ROF and reduces noise.
Here in this test: minus 45 % weight => 12 % more ROF
The swiss-cheesing test fail because of the unknown dropped fps. Have to test this again.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Previous
1
2
3
template
Next
About the Author
Collapse
Find out more about
jagillham
Working...
Yes
No
OK
OK
Cancel
X